Veteran Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger will be suspended 4-6 weeks into the 2010 season for violating the NFL’s personal conduct policy, reported ESPN yesterday afternoon.

Last month, a 20-year old college student accused “Big Ben” of sexually assaulting her in a nightclub in Georgia, although prosecutors did not charge Roethlisberger.

However, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is more stringent than the law.

Over the past few years, Goodell has been holding NFL players to a higher standard than the law with his excessive fines and suspensions. This case is no different.

There is no debate that Roethlisberger should not be looked upon as a role model for young kids because of the accusations and the information about the incident that keeps popping up, but that’s what parents’ guidance is for. Goodell is acting as though the NFL and its players have as much influence on kids as the words of their parents or Saturday morning cartoons.

Should Roethlisberger be punished? Of course. But six games is way too much.

The suspension not only affects Roethlisberger’s playing time, but it transforms the Steelers’ whole first part of the season into a circus balancing act. You can’t win the championship in September, but you sure can lose it.

With Big Ben watching from the couch for what could be almost half of the season, the Steelers are the ones that are really suffering.  It’s a shame to see the punishment of one person ruin a possible playoff run for over 40 others. Since 2004, Roethlisberger has only missed 10 games for the Steelers; the team owns a 5-5 record in those games.

Roethlisberger was the face of the Steeler’s franchise and arguably the most successfull quarterback that came out of his draft year (Eli Manning and Philip Rivers were the other two premiere names that were drafted in 2004). Now, Pittsburgh is looking to trade him for draft picks.

People have a right to choose not to be role models if they don’t want to be. Players, like Roethlisberger, aren’t the reason why kids are on the streets. That’s a household problem, not the NFL’s. A possible six game suspension punishes more than just Roethlisberger, it punishes an accomplished, competitive NFL franchise.

Congratulations, Jets fans. Barring any major injuries, your team has already won Superbowl XLV. Every hole the Jets might have had last season has already been filled through trades, and the draft is still one week away. The best rushing attack last season will most likely continue to flourish even after the loss of 2009’s third-leading rusher Thomas Jones to Kansas City. Shonn Greene’s dominance in the playoffs as a rookie can only get better as he receives more touches as the Jet’s new starter. Let’s not forget that New York also has five elephants in the shape of their offensive line blocking for him.  Jets’ running game: check.

Everyone’s favorite young quarterback Marc Sanchez started off strong, struggled mightily, and then led his team from a Wild Card berth to one win away from a shot against the New Orleans Saints. Not bad for a rookie NFL QB who only had one year of starting experience at USC, huh? Head coach Rex Ryan would go to any length to justify his choice to pick Sanchez with the sixth overall pick in 2009, even thievery. One pitch-black night, the New York front office snuck into the Pittsburgh facility and stole talented wide receiver Santonio Holmes right from under their noses. How selfish can you be, just grabbing a former Superbowl MVP while the Steelers weren’t looking?

Wait … Pittsburgh knew about this? They accepted a fifth-round pick to send Holmes to New York? Did no team learn from the Patriots-Raiders trade, sending Randy Moss to New England for merely a fourth-round pick? Last time I checked, the Pats came out on top there. The combination of Holmes with Braylon Edwards will create endless opportunities for Sanchez to blossom as a pro bowl passer, and with some pressure taken off Edwards, maybe he’ll catch a few balls this time. Jet’s passing game: check.

Now, my personal favorite football position is cornerback. There is no doubt that Darrelle Revis has become the best player at the most difficult defensive position. How do the Jets reward him (besides more money of course)? They add another cornerback to play alongside him. Not just any cornerback, a cornerback who just happened to lead the NFL in interceptions in 2007. The trade for Antonio Cromartie from the Chargers solidified a defense that needed no solidifying. Now, the New York Jets are just being greedy.

Forget the foolish Raiders, drafting possibly the biggest number one overall bust since Courtney Brown. Forget the Lions, doing what was thought the unthinkable by not winning a single game during the regular season. The St. Louis Rams have undoubtedly been the worst NFL football team in the past three or four years. Their offense has been as effective as using a vacuum cleaner to mop the kitchen floor. Their defense looks like they’re playing in slow motion … in slow motion. I bet the average NFL watcher could not name a single person after Stephen Jackson on that team. They have been long overdue of the top draft pick in April’s 2010 Collegiate Draft. Now, the talk of the town is who they will grab from the classroom and drag  onto the pig sty that is Edward Jones Dome.  The nearly unanimous top draft pick across everyone’s board is the fearsome Nebraska mammoth that is defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh.  Others have the highly successful, yet often injured, Oklahoma quarterback Sam Bradford strapping on the blue and gold. However, I shall tell you all what Rams should do with the top pick in the draft: trade it for Donovan McNabb. Yes … I just said that.

The Eagles have made it clear that they no longer require the services of the one player that once lead them to four consecutive NFC Championship games as well one Superbowl. The Rams have decided to scrap their most efficient quarterback since Kurt Warner in Marc Bulger. Now I’m no math major, but this seems like a no brainer to me. The Rams have no time to waste grooming a Sam Bradford or a Jimmy Clausen to run their offense, and if Suh turns out to be the next Adam Carriker (also drafted by the Rams), they will be right back to where they are now: bad. There is no player this year that the Rams should take with the top pick that screams, “Our troubles are over.” At 33, McNabb still has plenty of gas left in the tank, especially since he was benched a few times to give Kevin Kolb (who?) reps under center. His ability to throw the ball downfield would give St. Louis’ receivers a chance to make a name for themselves, especially since I cannot name a single Ram receiver off the top of my head. His running ability would open up options for one of the top running backs in the league in Stephen Jackson (although he deserves better). In addition to McNabb, trading the first overall pick allows for the ability to move down in the first round and possibly take, in my opinion, the best defensive player in the draft in safety Eric Berry. With the first overall pick in the draft, the Philadelphia Eagles can do … whatever the hell they want to do with it. I’m a Giants fan, so I could care less.

Nets’ CEO Brett Yormark made an effort to stand up for his team Monday night, but ended up embarrassing them instead.

A fan (no seriously, someone actually came to watch the worst team in the NBA) sitting in the second row wearing a paper bag over his head set Yormark off.

Photographers captured pictures of Yormark confronting the fan, who had an “are you serious?” look on his face.

The Nets, who have an outstanding 7-63 record, should be thankful they have any fans willing to pay for tickets, let alone come to a game. The childish behavior by Yormark was the epitome of the Nets’ franchise in recent years.

The frustrating season has taken its toll on the fans, team and obviously, Yormark. If someone was willing to pay for a ticket to see what could end up being the worst team in NBA history, don’t get in his or her face about it. Sitting through another losing game gets boring after a while, I’m sure, leaving fans who do attend trying to entertain themselves. The paper bag over the head is just an example of that.

Yormark released a statement about his actions the next day, but neglected to issue an apology to his paying customers;  a classless move for the CEO of a multimillion-dollar corporation.

If the outburst did anything at all, it just brought more attention to all of the Nets’ problems, like their losing team, relocation plans, the sale of the team, lying about attendance numbers and ridiculous marketing schemes. Like the one they pulled last night where anyone who wore a paper bad over their head could trade it in for a Nets’ backpack with a note inside it saying, “Thanks for letting us see your face. We hope to see it more often at Nets’ games. Regards, Brett Yormark.”

Why would anyone want to coach the Nets anyway?

The Nets can try to leave New Jersey, but Brooklyn doesn’t want them either — not just because of their awful record and bad behavior.

For a while, the Nets were a decent basketball team. Remember when they made the NBA finals that one time?  Or when Dr. J played for them? Oh, memories.

The Nets’ CEO needs to take a long, hard look at his organization and concentrate more about his team’s pile of enormous problems before he judges anyone else.

At the end of February, much of the sports world was mum: the Olympics that nobody cared about were wrapping up, basketball was uneventful, baseball’s spring training was still a few days away and football free agency had not started yet. Suddenly, as the calendar switched into March, the sports world was lit on fire.

The sparkplug: a pretend science created by ESPN. The name: Bracketology.

College basketball’s profound effect to spice up the rest of the sports world was on full display yet again this year. Projections of the field, who is on the cusp, or “bubble”, as it is typically called, and projections of who will win it all begin two weeks before the bracket is even officially announced. And with every year, as this process goes on, one thing is always brought up about the bracket: expansion.

The tournament originally included just eight schools in the 1939 tournament. In 1951, it doubled to sixteen. Two years later, it was between 22 and 25 schools. The number grew to 32 in 1975 before adding eight more slots in 1979. The most change occurred in the 1980s: the decade began with 48, became 53 in 1983, added another spot the next season, and then became the common 64-team format in 1985. In 2001, a 65^th spot was added and some critics want to see even more.

Some wish to do a massive overhaul and expand the tournament to 96 teams, which would be the largest single jump in bids ever. That would be 31 more spots than there currently are. That would essentially be like if the NIT tournament (32 teams) played themselves into the NCAA tournament. The argument is that small schools and the “Cinderella stories” that the tournament is known for are mostly gone by the third round. Expanding the field would also ensure that teams who felt robbed of a bid would be allowed to participate.

This season’s bubble team watch is showing the poorest résumés of any tournament in nearly thirty years. Teams that were left out last season would easily be in this year, according to experts. So why expand to get more teams when it is almost impossible to find teams worthy of the spots?

CBS Sports expert Brian De Los Santos believes, as of  11 p..m. Wednesday, there are 57 teams that are sure things in the tournament, between strong résumés and automatic conference bids. That leaves eight at-large spots and, according to De Los Santos, only 20 teams that have the right to fill those spots. With the expansion, the 12 teams that are left out would be in … but what about the other 19 spots? What scrub teams are going to be given a fighting chance then?

There has to be a line at some point. The 65-team field is fine, but I personally wish to see it stop at 68. There could be four play-in games, just like there were in 1983, and eight lower-market teams could all be featured on national television. It also means to not point out two teams specifically as the two worst in the tournament, while also taking the top of the cutting room floor and giving them an opportunity.

Expanding it to more teams, especially with this season, would be disastrous. No matter what the number is set at, there will always be a team that won’t make it. That is how it’s supposed to be.

Check out The Montclarion Sports Chronicles every weekday for a new blog.

With the Yankees new offseason acquisition in Javier Vasquez, most fantasy sites and owners are ranking Vasquez quite high on draft cheat-sheets. With a 15-10 record and a 2.87 era last season with Atlanta, he should be a good fantasy option this year with the heavy-hitting Yankee lineup as his supporting cast, right? Not exactly. Expect Vasquez’s success at Yankee Stadium to be limited.

Take into consideration that he was in the NL last year, and his 2.87 era isn’t as impressive as it sounds. In his four years playing in the AL, he has a 52-46 record, but has a 4.54 era. Last year, 14 of the 20 homeruns he gave up were against left-handed batters.

Leftys slugged .430 against Vasquez over his career, but when they pull the ball, that stat shoots up to .890. On all balls hit to the outfield, batters slugged .928. That doesn’t go too well with his .88 ground ball-to fly ball ratio with the Yankees in 2004. With Posada catching, his slugging against is .457. Also, Yankee’s stadium’s homerun park factor is 1.262, the highest of all major league ballparks. Compare this to Turner Field’s .861, one of the league’s lowest marks.

These factors, in combination with Yankee Stadium’s short and windy right field porch, his homeruns allowed, era, and slugging will increase.

In Vasquez’s 2004 season with the Yankees he had a decent 14-10 record with an era of 4.91 and gave up 33 homeruns, the second most he ever gave up in a single season. And all of this was in the old Yankee Stadium, not newer, more hitter-friendly one.

The postseason hasn’t brought him much success either. In only three games (two of which he pitched for the Yankees), he has a 1-2 record with a 10.34 era.

Most sites are over-estimating his draft value. CBS Sports has Vasquez ranked 49^th overall, right under Jon Lester (47) and Josh Beckett (48). Cliff Lee is ranked 51^st, and Jake Peavy is 56^th. All of these pitchers are better fantasy options than Vasquez.

Check out The Montclarion Sports Chronicles every weekday for a new blog.

The New York Yankees payroll for 2009 was $201 million, enough to win a long awaited World Series, but if the World Series was in basic math, the corporation would have came in last place.

When the Yankees clinched their 27th World Series Championship last October, they were guaranteed huge bonus. However, someone made a little math error that’s costing the players $10,000 each. The Yankees organization had to simply divide $21.2 million between a total of 46 players, coaches and staff.

Maybe George Steinbrenner should have spent some of that money on a decent accountant.

The Yankees are a billion dollar corporation. I know $21.2 million is a lot of pocket change to calculate, but who couldn’t do the New York Yankees’ basic math.

Apparently two trainers and a player were left off the list.  Maybe that one player just didn’t have a big enough name to get his full share.

Who forgot to “carry the one” creating the math error?

For some players that make $20 million a year, like Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter, that’s pocket change they probably blow their nose with. But that’s not what I find so unusual about the player’s union wanting their money back.

This also brings up the question, ‘what else are they miscalculating on?’

Maybe those box seats behind the catcher really aren’t supposed to be $2,000 a ticket. Maybe hot dogs are only supposed to be $3 instead of close to $10.

Whoever is doing the Yankees’ bookkeeping should do themselves, the players and the fans a huge favor and spend a day or two in a fourth grade math class and recalculate everything.

While the error will not hugely impact the lives of Jorge Posada and Mariano Rivera, what about the Joe Schmo who has to work double shifts to take his son to just one game this year.  Instead of increasing ticket prices, maybe they will find another huge discrepancy in the bankbooks that will allow this billion dollar team to lower their ticket prices.

I just did the simple math on a calculator on my cell phone for free. Maybe Steinbrenner should have paid me to do the calculations.

This past Sunday night, Americans from coast to coast erupted with cheers from their living room. It wasn’t because of Lindsay Vonn, or Apolo Anton-Ohno, but rather from athletes who get paid millions, the USA Men’s Hockey team.

The United States men’s victory over Canada in pool play was the first over their neighbors in the Olympics since 1960.  This huge upset also came almost 30 years to the day when the U.S. defeated the vaunted Soviet Union in the 1980 Olympics at Lake Placid. However, there was one big difference with the 1980 team, they were all amateurs.

The NHL began sending players to the Olympics in 1998 at Nagano, but is beginning to reconsider the policy for the next Winter Olympics, set for 2014 in Sochi, Russia. There are obvious issues with sending players to the Olympics, including the risk of injury, as well as the two week break in the NHL schedule that makes for a crammed late-season slate of games for teams. Ultimately, the decision is going to come down to money, as NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman will look to see if sending players to the Olympics works economically for the league.

If NHL players are pulled from the Olympics, it will be a serious detriment to the men’s hockey tournament. Unlike Olympic basketball, which is dominated by the United States every tournament, hockey is a more global sport and six of the 12 teams in this year’s tournament had a realistic chance to win the gold medal.

In addition, the talent level of the players in the tournament is so deep. This is clearly the most talented pool of players to date. It also brings marketable players to the table. Recognizable names such as Sidney Crosby for Canada, Alex Ovechkin for Russia, Henrik Lundqvist for Sweden and Zach Parise for Team USA draw viewers to the television. While it was nice to see a team of amateur players from the U.S. beat a team of Soviet pro players, how many players from that team can be named?

With the next Winter Olympics to be held in hockey hotbed Russia, the NHL should do everyone a favor and keep allowing their players to take part in the Olympics Games. The players want to be there, the fans love to watch them and it helps market star players just in time for the NHL season’s home stretch for after the Olympics. So to Gary Bettman and all the NHL executives across North America, don’t mess with something that is working. Keep the Olympic policy as is.

Last week was Ash Wednesday, which marked the beginning of Lent in the Catholic religion. Many Catholics annually attempt to give up or sacrifice something for the forty days that lead up to Easter. While many seem to fail and other non-Catholics use the time to test themselves, here are some suggestions to some sports personalities for what they should give up, even if it is for just forty days.

The media: While there are so many bad things that seem to get done, one thing that has been done collectively by all is a total invasion of Tiger Woods’ private life. After his open statement for his future on Friday, leave him alone. It is true that he is an adult and a person in the spotlight, but anyone that is going through life-shattering problems like Woods should be given some time without paparazzi and the constant questioning of his personal life.

The NBA and NFL: Everyone can understand that you are two of the biggest professional sport leagues in the world, but just take a break from talking about your difficulties with players’ unions and potential work stoppages. We as fans have not forgotten about the strike-shortened 1998-99 NBA season, the 1994 MLB strike and cancelled World Series, the shortened 1987 NFL season and the seldom-mentioned NFL referee strike early last decade. People love your sports and pay too much money to see them. Someone take a pay cut; you can afford it. Take one on the chin for the fans, because the fans are not going anywhere.

Manny Pacquiao: Put your pride of whatever you feel is right about what leads to your (hopefully) inevitable fight with Floyd “Money” Mayweather. Why is that? Just look at Floyd’s nickname: money. Your sport doesn’t have a lot of it. Also lacking: popularity, credibility and excitement. Boxing is a far cry from what it used to mean in society. A fight between arguably two of the best pound-for-pound boxers ever would be the only thing that could save the sport. Without it, the thriving mixed martial arts surge will consume boxing and kill it. For the simple fact of saving your sport, take a blood test before your fight. You should have nothing to hide, and if you do, then boxing is already dead.

Major League Baseball: Ironically, your season begins on Easter Sunday (April 4), so this advice is for your time during spring training. Mark McGwire, perhaps the most popular admitted steroid user from the 1990s, is back in baseball as a hitting coach. Let’s not even touch on all of the bad publicity that Albert Pujols is subject to just for being affiliated with an admitted steroid user. Do whatever you can to get the most accurate stories of these players “coming clean”, pun intended. Set the bar for the other leagues by giving every athlete frequent drug tests. If they refuse, then suspend them. Continuous refusal means they must leave the league. Fifteen years ago, nobody was afraid of bringing in replacement players. Don’t show fear now.

Check out The Montclarion Sports Chronicles every weekday for a new sports blog.

Tiger Woods is “coming out” tomorrow at 11 a.m.

Woods is scheduled to speak to the media for the first time since his sexual scandal hit the press. Once the press conference is over, it is certain that hundreds of articles and blogs will be written on his choice of words. Tearing up Tiger is fair game after the fact. But why are people ripping on Tiger’s PR strategy already?

In an article published in The Star Ledger today, Steve Politi wrote about how Tiger’s strategy is “clearly deficient.” How can someone make this assumption without hearing what Tiger has to say?

Politi pointed out that Tiger will not be taking questions and that the conference will be only five to seven minutes long; he referred to it as “handling this in the typical Tiger way.”

Who wouldn’t handle this very personal matter in their own way?

Politi further compared Tiger Woods to Alex Rodriguez and the way he handled his steroid scandal by saying Woods should follow the lead of Rodriguez.

These two situations aren’t comparable.

Alex Rodriguez offended baseball with his steroid use. Tiger Woods offended his wife and family. Yes, Woods is one of the biggest public figures of today, but he didn’t cheat golf. A-Rod had to do what he did because he offended every single baseball fan in the world. Golf fans know Tiger’s stroke is pure, no matter what his private life has got him into.

Richard Sandomir agrees. In an article published by The New York Times earlier today, he went on to say that Tiger is “blazing a new trail” with his press conference tomorrow. Sandomir stated that his situation isn’t like A-Rod’s, or McGwire’s, or even Eliot Spitzer’s.

Frankly, Tiger Woods doesn’t even need to apologize tomorrow. He can get away with saying simply: “I’m healthy and I’m ready to compete in the Masters in April.” Of course, sports reporters will have a field day by tearing Tiger’s supposed “apology” to shreds. But in reality, his return to golf is all that matters.

Tiger didn’t cheat the game of golf. As long as that statement rings true, his return to the game should and will be longed for.

Come tomorrow at 11:30 a.m. don’t be surprised if Tiger’s words are all over the tabloids. Just member that his only responsibility is to make amends with himself and his family.

He owes nothing to us.

Log on to www.sports.themontclarion.org every weekday for a new sports blog featured in The Montclarion Sports Chronicles.